Student Council Vending Machine Proposal Falls Short

January 18, 2023

%E2%80%9CIt+was+decided+that%2C+right+now%2C+%5Bvending+machines+are%5D+not+something+we+actually+need%2C%E2%80%9D+Upper+School+Assistant+Director+Adam+Gelb+said.+Staff+illustration%3A+Maya+Stone

Maya Stone

“It was decided that, right now, [vending machines are] not something we actually need,” Upper School Assistant Director Adam Gelb said. Staff illustration: Maya Stone

Despite Sophomore Class President Cody Kletter’s ambition to bring more food options to campus, the Senior Administration Team, consisting of 15 senior staff members, has decided against installing vending machines, citing an abundance of food options on campus and the potential negative environmental impact.

In August, Kletter met with Upper School Assistant Director Adam Gelb to review his idea of installing vending machines. “Initially, we discussed using the company MeFit Vending, and the administration was made fully aware of the services it provides, including healthy food options,” Kletter said. “The administration and I met with the CEO of the company on campus to discuss its services and potential vending machine locations.” According to their website, “MeFit Vending provides San Jose vending machines with nutritious, wholesome foods that promote a healthy lifestyle and eating habits.”

Kletter said numerous other students had expressed support for vending machines. Although Kletter praised Flik, the company that serves lunch at school, and said that the lunch they provide every day is excellent, he still hopes for more options. “In other hours, such as the morning and after school, there are students who are hungry and who want food, and vending machines would provide a way for students to have access to that food without needing to walk all the way downtown,” Kletter said.

Kletter said he hoped it could be another nutrition source for students at school. “Vending machines would also be very convenient for students, especially for those who may not have had time for breakfast and don’t want to walk downtown [and] people who may have missed lunch due to meetings,” Kletter said.

As part of his consideration process, Gelb met with Kletter to discuss his proposal. “[Kletter] was very proactive; he did a lot of planning,” Gelb said. However, after meeting with the Senior Administration Team, Gelb explained the team came to a collective decision that vending machines were not necessary on campus. “It was decided that, right now, [vending machines are] not something we actually need,” Gelb said.

According to Gelb, the Senior Administration Team’s rationale was that there were already good food options at school. “There’s a lot of food here offered during the school day during lunch that’s free. So, bringing extra money to campus to buy food on campus doesn’t feel great, given that we provide free food,” Gelb said.

Additionally, the team believes that students can get food downtown if they can’t find options at school. “10th, 11th and 12th graders can easily go to downtown Menlo Park and spend money and get a snack,” Gelb said. 

The Senior Administration Team also believes that the vending machines would exacerbate the already significant trash problem on campus. “There’s a number of reasons that went into the thought process of why we don’t necessarily have a need for [vending machines] […] on campus,” Gelb said.

Leave a Comment
About the Contributor
Photo of Jacob Reich
Jacob Reich, Video Editor
 

Number of years in The Coat of Arms: 2


Favorite aspect of journalism: interviewing people and getting to know them.


Interests outside of school: playing baseball, basketball, hanging out with friends.


Class of 2025

The Coat of Arms • Copyright 2023 • FLEX WordPress Theme by SNOLog in

Comments (0)

The Coat of Arms encourages dialogue with our audience. We welcome constructive comments that avoid slander, hate, profanity and misinformation. In an effort to give voice to a variety of perspectives, anonymous comments will be considered, but signed comments are preferred. If you would like to submit an anonymous comment, please write "Anonymous" in the "Name" field below. While a valid email address is required, The Coat of Arms will not publish your email address. The Editorial Board will review comments and decide whether they will be put online; the editors reserve the right to edit for concision.
All The Coat of Arms Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *